- Poor Decision Making processes including making panic decisions in response to drought conditions and replacement of electrical panels,
- Failure to get homeowner approval for significant change in complex look and operations,
- Failure to provide accurate and meaningful communications, fostering division, mistrust and rumors,
- In appropriate delegation of Board responsibilities to non-decision making committees and to individual homeowners, also fostering division, mistrust and rumors and possibly exposing the HOA to additional liability,
- The rendering of many rules and regulations useless by the Board’s use of selective enforcement especially against homeowners who have expressed concerns with the Board’s handling of HOA business,
- Failure to use a reasonable parliamentary method for running the regular homeowners meetings. The general tone and meeting tenure has become disrespectful and hostile to the homeowners for whom the Board serves and hostile to homeowner input,
- Failure to enforce governing documents and to follow the HOA architectural procedures leading to increased legal cost, litigation and possible HOA liability,
- Failure to establish and consistently follow a proper bid process for work requiring outside vendors.
- Failure to establish and follow proper billing processes with ALL vendors to prevent cost exposure for payment of services and materials not received,
- Failure to properly notice executive meetings, conducting HOA business in executive session not eligible for executive session privilege; discussing and approving HOA business outside of noticed meetings,
- Failure to adopt or follow legal election procedures and to conduct an election where equal access and resources are provided to both sides.
Wednesday, June 2, 2010
Primary Reasons for Recalling the Board of Directors
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This is a test of recording a post on this blog.
ReplyDeleteAll homeowners are invited to participate in this forum.
ReplyDeleteAn example of the Board’s incompetence and favoritism, occurred at the May Seascape Sur Board Meeting. At that time Tom Burns, a homeowner, read a letter containing many accusations against another homeowner that had nothing to do with the association and was completely out of place for a board meeting. Dan McCullough, president of the board, allowed this tirade to go on and made no attempt to stop Mr. Burns. Again, this had nothing to do with the Seascape Sur Board business and should not have been allowed to take place at a board meeting.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete